Speaker summary
68% 7 analyzed articles/videos 913.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Cooper results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Hasty Generalization , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 263.476 hits . Analysis detected 1,114.208 faulty-reasoning hits from 913.333 analyzed words across 7 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,425 of 28,364 speakers). This Brad Cooper is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. Brad Cooper
Speaker details
Total words: 913.333
Content count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 5.6% BS Score7 analyzed videos913.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 28.9% 28.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 4.6% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 4/15/2026, 5:58:36 PM