Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Etan Mabourakh results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 1,028 hits . Analysis detected 6,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,742 of 6,628 authors). This Etan Mabourakh is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Etan Mabourakh
Author details
Total words: 4,760
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.7% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.5% 17.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst