Speaker summary
67% 16 analyzed articles/videos 1,166.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Paulina Luna results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 276 hits . Analysis detected 3,239.002 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,166.333 analyzed words across 16 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 7.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,576 of 28,364 speakers). This Anna Paulina Luna is better (less manipulative) than 93.70% of the peer group. Anna Paulina Luna
Speaker details
Total words: 1,166.333
Content count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.3% percentile 7.4% BS Score16 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 27.5% 27.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Dunning-Kruger Effect Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.6% 17.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anecdotal: Speaker 27.5%, sitewide 5.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 3.1% Composition/Division: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 0.2% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 0.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst