Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marni Rose McFall results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 709 hits. Analysis detected 6,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,056 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,676 of 6,628 authors). This Marni Rose McFall is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Marni Rose McFall
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
30%Marni Rose McFall (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,056
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos