House GOP deadlocks over Trump’s demands, sending lawmakers home early 31%

By Associated Press60%

7/1/2026, 1:29:11 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 47.3% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 864 faulty-reasoning hits from 826 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.6% and a BS Rank of 31% (14,318 of 20,516 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the article peer group.

By LISA MASCARO, AP Congressional Correspondent 
WASHINGTON (AP)  Whither the U.S. 
House? 
As the nation celebrates its 250th birthday this weekend, the legislative branch has momentarily called it quits. 
The House leadership on Tuesday abruptly canceled votes and sent lawmakers home early for the holiday recess, Speaker Mike Johnson’s majority once again ground to a standstill by a Republican revolt over their own party’s agenda. 
In this case, it’s a standoff blocking the annual defense bill  with pay raises for the troops and other matters at a time of war  as the renegade Republicans push to include President Donald Trump’s own priority, the SAVE America Act, a strict voter ID bill. 
Last week, the Senate similarly shuttered after Trump's demands. 
The emptying Capitol provides another snapshot of the imbalance of power in Washington as a headstrong executive confronts a weakened Congress. 
For the second time in as many weeks, the House has simply given up. 
“It’s a relatively bad time in Congress,” Republican Rep. 
Dusty Johnson of South Dakota said recently. 
“A lot of my colleagues have forgotten how to govern.” 
**The scene is far different than last year's Fourth of July** 
A year ago this weekend brought a wholly different scene in Washington, as Trump gathered Republican lawmakers outside the White House for an ebullient July Fourth ceremony to sign what they called the “One, Big, Beautiful Bill” of tax breaks and spending cuts. 
It was a celebratory moment for Trump and the slim Republican majority  and for Johnson, who many doubted could pass the bill over the objections of Democrats who viewed it as tax giveaway at the expense of billions of dollars in cuts to health care and food stamps for Americans in need. 
Johnson was so reliant on Trump's power to help push the bill to approval that he gifted the president a speaker's gavel, which Democrats and others saw as a worrisome symbol of the transference of power from one branch of government to the other. 
“We’re not dealing with Speaker Mike Johnson,” Democratic Rep. 
Pete Aguilar of California, the caucus chairman, said in a recent interview. 
“Unfortunately, Speaker Donald Trump does not want us in this week.” 
**Trump makes conflicting demands on his party in Congress** 
As Johnson works to keep Trump close, the president's demands seem to grow in ways the Republican speaker can't always deliver. 
The president’s insistence on the SAVE America Act, which doesn't have enough support in the Senate to pass, has interrupted almost all other business in Congress. 
Trump has refused to sign a popular bipartisan housing bill that cleared both chambers until the voting bill is also approved. 
He calls the housing bill a “yawn.” 
Johnson spent four hours last week at the White House and said he spent another two hours with the president this week on a path forward. 
“I told him, ‘Mr. 
President, I don’t have any tattoos, but if I did, it’d say SAVE America on my shoulder,’ OK?” 
Johnson said over the weekend on Fox News. 
“We passed it three times in the House already. 
We’re going to pass it again.” 
But by Tuesday, a House vote to advance the legislation collapsed. 
Republicans led by Rep. 
Anna Paulina Luna of Florida argued that Johnson's plan to attach the voting bill to the defense bill was essentially a doomed strategy that would be rejected in the Senate. 
“That’s disappointing,” acknowledged Republican Majority Leader Steve Scalise of Louisiana, who insisted the GOP would try again. 
“We’re going to keep trying because we have to,” he said. 
“We’re not done doing big things.” 
**As America celebrates its 250th birthday, Congress is adrift** 
The founders of the new democracy clearly had aspirations for the Congress, putting it first in the Constitution as the Article One branch of government, ahead of the executive and judicial branches. 
But as lawmakers face voters this fall, they will have to answer for these dwindling days on their calendar. 
House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said the problem is not the Congress, it's the GOP. 
“Donald Trump is fighting with Senate Republicans, Senate Republicans are fighting with House Republicans, and House Republicans are fighting with each other,” said Jeffries, who is in line to become House speaker if Democrats win control in fall. 
“It’s not the Congress that’s struggling. 
It’s House Republicans who are struggling,” he said. 
Jeffries said Democrats are fighting “to make life more affordable for the American people.” 
As they left the Capitol for an extended recess, lawmakers voiced frustration with the House’s dysfunction. 
Rep. 
Kevin Kiley, who left the Republican Party to become an independent earlier this year, said the situation in the House is “frustrating.” 
“It’s just like déjà vu where many times now we run into some sort of obstacle,” he said, “then the solution is just to go home.” 
Associated Press writer Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.2%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.1%newyorkdailynews: 3.3%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.2%Associated Press: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias4.2%This article: 47.3%Associated Press: 7.3%newyorkdailynews: 6.1%Framing Effect47.3%This article: 5.8%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Loss Aversion5.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect1.1%This article: 0.7%Associated Press: 2.0%newyorkdailynews: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.4%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 16.5%Associated Press: 8.8%newyorkdailynews: 9.7%Negativity Bias16.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Associated Press: 1.1%newyorkdailynews: 1.3%In-Group Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.5%newyorkdailynews: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.9%Associated Press: 1.5%newyorkdailynews: 1.5%Recency Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.9%Associated Press: 3.5%newyorkdailynews: 3.2%Appeal to Authority3.9%This article: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.8%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%False Dilemma0.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.0%Associated Press: 2.7%newyorkdailynews: 4.1%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 4.6%newyorkdailynews: 7.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.3%newyorkdailynews: 3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.8%newyorkdailynews: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.3%newyorkdailynews: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.2%Associated Press: 1.2%newyorkdailynews: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 3.0%newyorkdailynews: 6.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%newyorkdailynews: 3.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.9%newyorkdailynews: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%newyorkdailynews: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%newyorkdailynews: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

826 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers30%attributed speech577writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageDusty Johnson • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDusty Johnson • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coveragePete Aguilar • 12 words • 0.0% coveragePete Aguilar • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageAnna Paulina Luna • 30 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Scalise • 17 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Scalise • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Scalise • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 38 words • 0.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 6 words • 0.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Kiley • 22 words • 0.0% coverageKevin Kiley • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hakeem Jeffries

100%flagged-word coverage
52 attributed words21% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Hakeem Jeffries: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.