Publication summary
26% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These inewsource results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Status Quo Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 667 hits . Analysis detected 6,521 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,092 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 19% (429 of 524 publications). This inewsource is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 13,092
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst