Author summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Diego Documenters results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 231 hits . Analysis detected 1,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 23% (5,743 of 7,438 authors). This San Diego Documenters is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. San Diego Documenters
Author details
Total words: 3,472
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst