Little Italy group, city of San Diego at 'stalemate' over bike lane 16%

By San Diego Documenters18%

7/28/2026, 8:07:25 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including no named faulty reasoning patterns yet, with no single egregious example has been isolated yet. Analysis detected 1,236 faulty-reasoning hits from 868 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29.1% and a BS Rank of 16% (19,742 of 23,506 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the article peer group.

Little Italy group, city of San Diego at 'stalemate' over bike lane 
This story was originally published by our partner The San Diego Sun. 
Sign up for its newsletter. 
An unfinished bike lane project that passes in front of Little Italy’s 100-year-old Our Lady of the Rosary Church is still unsatisfactory to locals despite recent reconfigurations by the city. 
The church lost its long-held curb access in April when a two-way cycle track was drawn onto State Street. 
Limousines and hearses could no longer unload next to the sidewalk for weddings and funerals, and an accessible parking spot was removed to make room for the bike lane. 
The neighborhood pushed back and was met with resistance from the city. 
While some adjustments have since been made to the road design, it remains unlikely the community will get the further changes it deems necessary for pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
“I feel like we’re at a stalemate,” Little Italy Association Executive Director Chris Gomez told The San Diego Sun. 
“I think that there was an opportunity for conversation and, unfortunately, once the decision was made, the vault sealed up and all communication coming out had stopped.” 
Here’s the latest: 
* City workers redrew a floating space in front of the church to re-include an accessible parking spot behind the loading zone. 
* The bike lane remains at the curb since the city installed it in the spring. 
* Additional project steps still need to be completed, and it is unknown when the bike lane will open. 
The project is part of the Downtown Mobility Plan passed in 2016 to build out a network of bike lanes and encourage bicycle commuting. 
On State Street, plans were to outfit the length of the west side of the road  in front of the church  with a buffered, two-way cycle track. 
Early on, the neighborhood petitioned instead for a “sharrow,” a shared lane for vehicles and bikes with an arrow painted on the road, on the church’s block. 
From the Documenters 
This story was written by Brisa Karow, a San Diego Documenter. 
The Documenters program trains and pays community members to document what happens at public meetings. 
It’s run by inewsource, a nonpartisan nonprofit newsroom dedicated to investigative and accountability journalism. 
Read more about the program here. 
Become a Documenter 
With the church being a hub for crowds and events, parishioners regularly spill out into the street, and there were concerns about collisions in the bike lane. 
Bike San Diego, a nonprofit that advocates for a connected network of protected bike lanes throughout the city, has opposed the church’s calls for a redesign. 
Board member Monica de la Cruz said a shared lane on the block would create a gap in the network and pose safety risks for bicyclists. 
“We have heard calls from [Our] Lady of the Rosary to redesign this project to sharrows, which would create unsafe conflict points where cyclists would be forced to ride through car traffic to exit the bikeway and re-enter the bikeway just for this block,” she said. 
City spokesperson Ramon Galindo said in response to the church’s pushback, they reconfigured the striping in front of the church, noting they put an accessible spot back in. 
It floats in the road rather than flush with the sidewalk like before. 
“We did our best to accommodate the Our Lady of the Rosary Church’s request by changing the striping plan,” Galindo said. 
The church doesn’t agree. 
Our Lady of the Rosary representative Mary Elizabeth Novell pointed a finger in Mayor Todd Gloria’s direction, saying he neglected the neighborhood’s needs in favor of pushing forward the project. 
“Gloria used to live two blocks from here,” Novell said. 
“He knows exactly what is in front of this church. 
He knows exactly how it’s laid out.” 
“He doesn’t care about this,” she added. 
“He doesn’t care about anybody who lives here. 
He cares about his project.” 
The Mayor’s Office has not had a representative in attendance at Little Italy Association board meetings this year, according to board minutes. 
Novell lamented that the city’s communication regarding the project has lacked. 
A mayoral spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment about attendance at downtown neighborhood meetings. 
Bottom line, Novell said, they still don’t have access to the curb and she’s concerned about parishioners’ safety. 
People unloading in the new accessible spot will have to travel along a roughly 40 foot loading zone to access the ramp in the curb in front of the church. 
Hearse and limo drivers have been continuing to pull into where the loading zone used to be (currently the unopened bike lane). 
Gomez said the LIA will continue to advocate for the community’s needs but it may “fall on deaf ears.” 
“We will see what happens over the next period of time, whether it’s a year or two years,” he said. 
“Let’s hope that there’s no injuries or fatalities that happen because of this negligent act.” 
Brisa Karow is an independent journalist living in San Diego. 
She is part of inewsource’s San Diego Documenters program and regularly reports on local government throughout the county. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.8%inewsource: 1.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%San Diego Documenters: 2.7%inewsource: 2.5%Availability Heuristic7.8%This article: 3.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.7%inewsource: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic3.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.0%San Diego Documenters: 3.9%inewsource: 4.0%Framing Effect6.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 1.4%inewsource: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.0%San Diego Documenters: 1.5%inewsource: 3.4%Status Quo Bias6.0%This article: 2.8%San Diego Documenters: 0.7%inewsource: 0.6%Sunk Cost Effect2.8%This article: 2.4%San Diego Documenters: 0.6%inewsource: 5.1%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 9.8%San Diego Documenters: 5.5%inewsource: 1.6%Pessimism Bias9.8%This article: 26.6%San Diego Documenters: 6.7%inewsource: 4.0%Negativity Bias26.6%This article: 5.6%San Diego Documenters: 1.4%inewsource: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias5.6%This article: 3.7%San Diego Documenters: 3.2%inewsource: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error3.7%This article: 1.4%San Diego Documenters: 0.3%inewsource: 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias1.4%This article: 0.9%San Diego Documenters: 0.2%inewsource: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.9%This article: 3.5%San Diego Documenters: 0.9%inewsource: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.5%This article: 3.7%San Diego Documenters: 0.9%inewsource: 0.8%Halo Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%San Diego Documenters: 0.9%inewsource: 1.4%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 4.3%San Diego Documenters: 3.6%inewsource: 0.9%Ad Hominem4.3%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 1.3%inewsource: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.7%San Diego Documenters: 0.9%inewsource: 1.8%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 3.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.7%inewsource: 1.1%False Dilemma3.0%This article: 5.3%San Diego Documenters: 1.8%inewsource: 0.8%Slippery Slope5.3%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.6%San Diego Documenters: 2.1%inewsource: 2.9%Hasty Generalization7.6%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.9%San Diego Documenters: 2.3%inewsource: 1.8%Appeal to Emotion5.9%This article: 3.2%San Diego Documenters: 0.8%inewsource: 0.6%Begging the Question3.2%This article: 2.5%San Diego Documenters: 0.6%inewsource: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.5%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.9%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.1%San Diego Documenters: 0.8%inewsource: 2.2%Anecdotal3.1%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.3%San Diego Documenters: 1.1%inewsource: 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.3%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.2%San Diego Documenters: 0.5%inewsource: 0.2%Unattributed Quote2.2%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 9.6%San Diego Documenters: 2.4%inewsource: 0.9%Biased Writer Voice9.6%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%San Diego Documenters: 0.0%inewsource: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%San Diego Documenters: 0.6%inewsource: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.9%

868 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers41%attributed speech515writer words
Selected voice

Ramon Galindo

100%flagged-word coverage
49 attributed words14% of attributed speech53% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.1 ptsWriter: 16.1%Ramon Galindo: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.6 ptsWriter: 1.6%Ramon Galindo: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.