Keyword summary
18% 1 analyzed article/video 868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Downtown San Diego results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 231 hits . Analysis detected 1,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (35,765 of 43,204 keywords). This Downtown San Diego is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. Downtown San Diego
Keyword details
Total words: 3,472
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.2% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst