Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ramon Galindo results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 147 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (18,008 of 35,180 speakers). This Ramon Galindo is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Ramon Galindo
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠49%Ramon Galindo (selected)30%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 65.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510048.8% percentile
30.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos65.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 28.6%28.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos