Publication summary
3%3 analyzed articles/videos3,901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Assembly NC results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 2.1% saturation with 449 hits. Analysis detected 4,211 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,682 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (521 of 524 publications). This The Assembly NC is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group.
The Assembly NC
Publication ranking list
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

1% percentile
02550751000.6% percentile
0.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles21.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 1.7%1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate