Author summary
6%1 analyzed article/video3,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Friend results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 3% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 3,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,156 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (7,440 of 7,554 authors). This Elizabeth Friend is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Friend
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Cleveland Documenters1%
0%T. Christian Miller1%
0%Ken Armstrong1%
1%Brenna Ehrlich1%
2%Elizabeth Friend (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,156
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

2% percentile
02550751001.5% percentile
0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos