Author summary
43% 1 analyzed article/video 1,491 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Futterman results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 439 hits . Analysis detected 3,532 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 24% (5,734 of 7,495 authors). This Katie Futterman is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Katie Futterman
Author details
Total words: 5,964
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst