Author summary
7% 1 analyzed article/video 1,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phoebe Huss results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 334 hits . Analysis detected 2,292 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 6% (7,065 of 7,495 authors). This Phoebe Huss is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Phoebe Huss
Author details
Total words: 6,776
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst