Author summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crystal Niebla results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 196 hits . Analysis detected 907 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,344 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (4,466 of 7,495 authors). This Crystal Niebla is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Crystal Niebla
Author details
Total words: 2,344
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst