Keyword summary
35% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,170 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ozempic results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,752 hits . Analysis detected 19,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,960 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (30,768 of 35,715 keywords). This Ozempic is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group. Ozempic
Keyword details
Total words: 23,960
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles24K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst