Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TAMARA PRENN results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 512 hits . Analysis detected 3,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 74% (1,745 of 6,628 authors). This TAMARA PRENN is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. TAMARA PRENN
Author details
Total words: 3,016
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.7% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.8% 16.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.0% 17.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.5% 13.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.8%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.5%, sitewide 0.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst