Author summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,895 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sydney Lupkin results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,297 hits . Analysis detected 11,985 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,125 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,594 of 6,244 authors). This Sydney Lupkin is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Sydney Lupkin
Author details
Total words: 12,125
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.1%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst