Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 142 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brent Baughman results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Nature , and Bandwagon , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 146 hits . Analysis detected 618 faulty-reasoning hits from 426 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.1% and a BS Rank of 93% (495 of 6,315 authors). This Brent Baughman is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group. Brent Baughman
Author details
Total words: 426
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 92.2% percentile 8.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles426 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 34.3% 34.3% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 12.7% 12.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 31.5% 31.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Author 34.3%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Author 31.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 13.4%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Author 12.7%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 8.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.5% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst