Keyword summary
78% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Criminal Court results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 3,587 hits . Analysis detected 26,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,792 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (18,673 of 34,568 keywords). This International Criminal Court is better (less manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group. International Criminal Court
Keyword details
Total words: 19,792
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 15% 7/17/2026, 2:58:26 PM