WAMU⁠15%

The News Roundup – International ⁠83%

7/17/2026, 2:58:26 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 12 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.3% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 311 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (3,861 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the article peer group.

Questions about the operational status of the Strait of Hormuz continue to echo around the globe. 
And President Donald Trump and Iranian leaders traded barbs following the lapse of the ceasefire and renewed strikes between the two combatants. 
Following devastating Russian attacks, June was the deadliest month for civilians in Ukraine since 2022. 
And U.S. 
Secretary of State Marco Rubio says that the U.S. will attempt to diplomatically dismantle the International Criminal Court. 
We cover the most important stories from around the globe in the international hour of the News Roundup. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.8%WAMU: 2.2%Confirmation Bias18.8%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.7%WAMU: 2.9%Availability Heuristic16.7%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 41.7%WAMU: 5.2%Framing Effect41.7%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 18.8%WAMU: 0.7%Status Quo Bias18.8%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 2.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 32.3%WAMU: 7.4%Negativity Bias32.3%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 22.9%WAMU: 1.3%Recency Bias22.9%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 37.5%WAMU: 2.8%Appeal to Authority37.5%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 4.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 22.9%WAMU: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)22.9%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 16.7%WAMU: 2.5%Anecdotal16.7%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 18.8%WAMU: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)18.8%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 18.8%WAMU: 1.2%Unattributed Quote18.8%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 58.3%WAMU: 2.7%Biased Writer Voice58.3%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 1.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%WAMU: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

96 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker19%attributed speech78writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marco Rubio

100%flagged-word coverage
18 attributed words100% of attributed speech91% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marco Rubio: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-71.8 ptsWriter: 71.8%Marco Rubio: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.