Topic summary
58% 37 analyzed articles/videos 25,968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Conflict results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 14,715 hits . Analysis detected 104,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 105,501 analyzed words across 37 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 19% (12,420 of 15,330 topics). This Military Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Military Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 105,501
Article count: 37
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score37 analyzed articles105.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 15% 7/17/2026, 2:58:26 PM