Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Brian Karem results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 2,164 hits . Analysis detected 14,447 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,187 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,360 authors). This Brian Karem is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Brian Karem
Author details
Total words: 11,187
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.3% 19.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.4% 13.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 13.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst