Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These JOEAL CALUPITAN results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 1,009 hits . Analysis detected 3,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,960 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,577 of 6,258 authors). This JOEAL CALUPITAN is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. JOEAL CALUPITAN
Author details
Total words: 4,960
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst