Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AARON FAVILA results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 789 hits. Analysis detected 2,870 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,388 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,631 of 6,215 authors). This AARON FAVILA is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
AARON FAVILA
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
58%AARON FAVILA (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,388
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 23.3%23.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 23.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Straw Man: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Special Pleading: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos