Keyword summary
69% 13 analyzed articles/videos 20,439 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Counterterrorism results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 9,793 hits . Analysis detected 89,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 71,883 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (22,272 of 34,293 keywords). This Counterterrorism is better (less manipulative) than 64.90% of the peer group. Counterterrorism
Keyword details
Total words: 71,883
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.1% percentile 2.3% BS Score13 analyzed articles71.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst