MS NOW95%

Key counterterrorism official in Trump administration resigns in protest over war in Iran91%

By Steve Benen95%

3/17/2026, 1:55:14 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Horn Effect, Ad Hominem, and Negativity Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,843 faulty-reasoning hits from 699 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 84.4% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,046 of 21,197 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the article peer group.

Joe Kent, whom Senate Republicans confirmed last summer to serve as the director of the National Counterterrorism Center, has made headlines for a variety of unfortunate reasons, but on Tuesday morning, the Washington Republican made news in an entirely unexpected way: He announced that he’s resigning in protest from the Trump administration over the war in Iran. 
In a brief item published to social media, Kent wrote: 
After much reflection, I have decided to resign from my position as Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, effective today. 
I cannot in good conscience support the ongoing war in Iran. 
Iran posed no imminent threat to our nation, and it is clear that we started this war due to pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby. 
Kent, who included an image of his formal resignation letter, added that he considers it an honor to have served under Donald Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. 
His tweet concluded, “May God bless America.” 
He is the first and only prominent official from the Republican administration to step down over the U.S. military offensive in the Middle East. 
‘Good thing he’s out’ 
In response to Kent’s departure, Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday that he “always” thought the counterterrorism official was “a nice guy” but “weak on security.” 
"Very weak on security,” the president said. 
“It's a good thing that he's out." 
One White House official told MS NOW’s Jake Traylor that they believe Kent’s resignation could lead to a pattern of other administration officials stepping away from their roles in protest. 
Another White House senior official said they were shocked by the resignation and noted the rarity of a public resignation of this kind. 
A third White House official said Kent did not have “power or influence” despite being the director of the National Counterterrorism Center and encouraged other critics of the war to swiftly exit the administration. 
All three White House officials were granted anonymity to speak candidly about internal dynamics. 
‘Deeply troubling’ record 
Kent was a contentious figure long before he joined the president’s team. 
Indeed, The Associated Press published a memorable report during Kent’s 2022 Republican congressional campaign, for example, highlighting his “connections to right-wing extremists, including a campaign consultant who was a member of the Proud Boys.” 
The Seattle Times later noted Kent’s “reported associations with white nationalists and other far-right groups, and embrace of conspiracy theories on an array of subjects.” 
Kent insisted, for example, that the 2020 presidential election was “rigged and stolen” and that the FBI was “corrupt” and needed to be brought “to heel.” 
Kent has also defended Jan. 6 rioters as “political prisoners” and called the Covid-19 vaccines an “experimental gene therapy.” 
Despite (or perhaps because of) this record, the Republican spent recent months working as the acting chief of staff to Gabbard  herself a longtime opponent of a U.S. war in Iran  and was accused of brazenly trying to politicize intelligence, allegedly ordering analysts to “rewrite” intelligence assessments to help the White House. 
GOP senators nevertheless confirmed Kent last summer. 
His tenure didn’t quite reach the eight-month mark. 
Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia called Kent’s record “deeply troubling” but said he agreed with his resignation. 
“I strongly disagree with many of the positions he has espoused over the years, particularly those that risk politicizing our intelligence community,” Warner said in a statement on Tuesday. 
“But on this point, he is right: there was no credible evidence of an imminent threat from Iran that would justify rushing the United States into another war of choice in the Middle East.” 
In his resignation letter, Kent pushed a false conspiracy theory that Israeli officials and the media conspired to dupe Trump into launching a war with Iran. 
Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., bashed Kent for resigning and appeared to suggest he’s antisemitic. 
“Good riddance. Iran has murdered more than a thousand Americans,” Bacon wrote in a post on X on Tuesday. 
“Anti-Semitism is an evil I detest, and we surely don’t want it in our government.” 
Kent’s departure leaves the United States without a director of the National Counterterrorism Center during a war, which seems less than ideal. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 34.0%Steve Benen: 10.5%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias34.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.6%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Steve Benen: 3.7%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic11.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.1%Steve Benen: 1.9%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 3.1%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 25.0%Steve Benen: 23.0%MS NOW: 15.5%Framing Effect25.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.0%Steve Benen: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.3%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Steve Benen: 3.1%MS NOW: 3.3%Pessimism Bias7.4%This article: 28.2%Steve Benen: 29.0%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias28.2%This article: 19.7%Steve Benen: 2.1%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias19.7%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 4.7%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 26.8%Steve Benen: 3.4%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias26.8%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 3.2%MS NOW: 2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.9%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 33.5%Steve Benen: 4.4%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect33.5%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 2.9%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Steve Benen: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 28.3%Steve Benen: 7.8%MS NOW: 4.8%Ad Hominem28.3%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.6%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.9%Steve Benen: 6.3%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority6.9%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.6%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 4.3%Steve Benen: 1.7%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope4.3%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 8.9%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 2.7%Steve Benen: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring2.7%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.2%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.0%Steve Benen: 11.3%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion9.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 3.5%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.9%Steve Benen: 3.3%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.9%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.4%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 2.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.9%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 16.0%Steve Benen: 2.2%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy16.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 3.8%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 22.9%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 8.6%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.6%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

699 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.