Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Counterterrorism Policy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32% saturation with 671 hits. Analysis detected 5,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,097 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (1,707 of 16,562 topics). This Counterterrorism Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group.
Counterterrorism Policy
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠90%Counterterrorism Policy (selected)9%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,097
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510089.7% percentile
8.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 25.3%25.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 27.1%27.1%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 17.8%17.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 32.0%32.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Topic 10.3%10.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.5%12.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 13.2%13.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.3%7.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.3%8.3%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 32.0%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 27.1%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 1.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos