Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Kent results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Confirmation Bias, and Horn Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.8% saturation with 884 hits. Analysis detected 8,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,069 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,922 of 37,536 keywords). This Joe Kent is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Joe Kent
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
93%Joe Kent (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,069
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510092.2% percentile
8.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 27.6%27.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 22.7%22.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 27.3%27.3%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 18.2%18.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 28.8%28.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 22.1%22.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.8%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 27.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 26.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 1.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate