Keyword summary
30% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Board Of Supervisors results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 2,323 hits . Analysis detected 24,283 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,101 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,297 of 37,536 keywords). This Board Of Supervisors is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Board Of Supervisors
Keyword details
Total words: 28,101
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles28.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst