Author summary
72%1 analyzed article/video1,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steve Scauzillo results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Loss Aversion, and Pessimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 575 hits. Analysis detected 4,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,738 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,565 of 6,170 authors). This Steve Scauzillo is better (less manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group.
Steve Scauzillo
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
43%Steve Scauzillo (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,738
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

42% percentile
025507510042.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 10.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos