Publication summary
81% 1 analyzed article/video 1,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Gabriel Valley Tribune results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Loss Aversion , and Pessimism Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 575 hits . Analysis detected 4,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,738 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 66% (130 of 379 publications). This San Gabriel Valley Tribune is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. San Gabriel Valley Tribune Publication details
Total words: 5,738
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 10.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst