Author summary
65%3 analyzed articles/videos733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julianna Morano results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,264 hits. Analysis detected 8,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,194 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,459 of 6,215 authors). This Julianna Morano is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group.
Julianna Morano
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
29%Julianna Morano (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,194
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510028.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate