Author summary
65% 3 analyzed articles/videos 733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julianna Morano results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,264 hits . Analysis detected 8,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,194 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 29% (4,459 of 6,215 authors). This Julianna Morano is better (less manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Julianna Morano
Author details
Total words: 10,194
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst