Publication summary
55% 14 analyzed articles/videos 19,389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fresnoland results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 4,526 hits . Analysis detected 45,127 faulty-reasoning hits from 66,850 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 17% (328 of 391 publications). This Fresnoland is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 66,850
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score14 analyzed articles66.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst