Author summary
72%1 analyzed article/video596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Bergstrom results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 202 hits. Analysis detected 1,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,788 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,914 of 6,602 authors). This Danielle Bergstrom is worse (more manipulative) than 71.00% of the peer group.
Danielle Bergstrom
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
71%Danielle Bergstrom (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,788
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510071.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.3%11.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.7%2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.4%Red Herring: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos