Author summary
30% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,234 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Omar S. Rashad results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 945 hits . Analysis detected 6,724 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,702 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 8% (6,158 of 6,629 authors). This Omar S. Rashad is better (less manipulative) than 92.90% of the peer group. Omar S. Rashad
Author details
Total words: 12,702
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst