Author summary
â 77% 1 analyzed article/video 2,327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diego Vargas results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 619 hits . Analysis detected 5,440 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,981 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of â 41% (3,786 of 6,350 authors). This Diego Vargas is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Diego Vargas
Author details
Total words: 6,981
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.5% 7.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst