Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gilare Zada results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 139 hits . Analysis detected 995 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,769 of 6,628 authors). This Gilare Zada is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Gilare Zada
Author details
Total words: 2,108
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 6.6% 6.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Circular Reasoning: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Red Herring: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst