Topic summary
52% 32 analyzed articles/videos 19,948 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Warfare results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 10,213 hits . Analysis detected 101,197 faulty-reasoning hits from 98,777 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,354 of 15,522 topics). This Warfare is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 98,777
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score32 analyzed articles98.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst