Author summary
51%6 analyzed articles/videos2,543 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Bowers Bahney results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,027 hits. Analysis detected 10,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,404 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,517 of 6,197 authors). This Jennifer Bowers Bahney is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Jennifer Bowers Bahney
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
44%Jennifer Bowers Bahney (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,404
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510043.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.9%9.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.0%7.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 8.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate