Topic summary
37% 17 analyzed articles/videos 5,752 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Canada Relations results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 4,443 hits . Analysis detected 34,506 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,629 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,092 of 15,746 topics). This US Canada Relations is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. US Canada Relations
Topic details
Total words: 33,629
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score17 analyzed articles33.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.2% 13.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst