Topic summary
40%9 analyzed articles/videos2,567 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Republican Party results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,521 hits. Analysis detected 9,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,672 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (9,752 of 15,149 topics). This U S Republican Party is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.7%15.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

Trump Accounts launch July 4, giving newborns $1,000. Here’s what to know6%
AP News53%By MORIAH BALINGIT41%7/2/2026, 12:31:20 PM
Why resisting Trump has galvanized Black Democrats as the midterms approach99%
The Washington Post92%By Gregory S. Schneider0%6/29/2026, 9:00:00 AM
With time running out, Trump digs in on changing midterm election rules100%
The Washington Post92%By Patrick Marley0% Ben Binday0%6/28/2026, 10:00:00 AM
Four takeaways from primaries in Georgia, Alabama and Oklahoma86%
The Washington Post92%By Praveena Somasundaram0%6/17/2026, 9:00:00 AM
He hasn’t been seen in Congress for months. Now Republicans are worried.87%
The Washington Post92%By Dan Merica0% Anna Liss-Roy0%5/29/2026, 10:00:01 AM
Framing…13%Negativ…42%Halo Ef…26%
South Carolina Republicans block Trump’s effort to gain more House seats14%
The Washington Post92%By Patrick Marley0%5/26/2026, 2:17:50 PM
Paxton crushes Cornyn in Senate primary in a big win for MAGA78%
The Washington Post92%By Matthew Choi0%5/26/2026, 9:00:00 AM
Paxton dominates Cornyn in Texas US Senate runoff, the latest sign of Trump’s hold on GOP40%
AP News53%By THOMAS BEAUMONT53% JESSE BEDAYN68%5/26/2026, 4:02:12 AM
Takeaways from primaries where Trump demonstrated power over GOP
The Washington Post92%By Hannah Knowles0% Dan Merica0% Patrick Marley0%5/20/2026, 9:00:00 AM
Vance and Rubio step behind the lectern — and deeper into 2028 territory69%
The Washington Post92%By Cat Zakrzewski0% Natalie Allison0%5/19/2026, 10:42:43 PM