Author summary
54% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,214 analyzed words
BS Summary: These THOMAS BEAUMONT results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Ad Hominem , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,310 hits . Analysis detected 11,718 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,240 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 31% (4,410 of 6,316 authors). This THOMAS BEAUMONT is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group. THOMAS BEAUMONT
Author details
Total words: 12,240
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.7% 10.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst