AP News52%

Paxton dominates Cornyn in Texas US Senate runoff, the latest sign of Trump’s hold on GOP 40%

By THOMAS BEAUMONT54% JESSE BEDAYN68%

5/26/2026, 4:02:12 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 197 hits. Analysis detected 1,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,066 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (12,368 of 20,515 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the article peer group.

PLANO, Texas (AP)  Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton won the Republican nomination for U.S. 
Senate on Tuesday, easily defeating four-term Sen. 
John Cornyn in the latest contest where President Donald Trump sought to oust an incumbent he saw as insufficiently loyal. 
Trump endorsed Paxton last week, calling him a “true MAGA warrior.” 
Paxton’s victory in Tuesday’s runoff makes Cornyn  who was first elected to the Senate in 2002  the first Republican senator from Texas to lose the party’s nomination for reelection. 
Cheers rang through the ballroom at Paxton’s election night party when the race was called, and he took the stage to supporters chanting his name. 
He quickly gave credit to Trump. 
“When everyone in Washington told him to abandon me and abandon the people of Texas, he didn’t listen,” Paxton said. 
“President Trump is the leader of our party, and his endorsement is the most powerful force in politics.” 
Cornyn’s loss followed primaries this month where Trump successfully backed challengers to Republican lawmakers who had displeased him in Louisiana, Kentucky and Indiana, a sign of his enduring influence among primary voters. 
The candidates that Trump endorsed in those states are expected to easily win against Democratic opponents. 
However, the president’s decision to boost Paxton, who won Tuesday with a sliver of the Republican base who shrugged off his past scandals, may be a bigger gamble in the general election. 
Democrats are hopeful that their nominee, state Rep. 
James Talarico, has a rare opportunity to win a statewide race in Texas  and help the party retake control of the Senate  with Paxton as his opponent. 
Tuesday’s runoffs also decided Democratic U.S. 
House nominees for districts in Dallas and Houston that overwhelmingly support Democrats, and a San Antonio-area seat the party wants to flip. 
In Austin on Tuesday night, Cornyn gave a short concession speech tinged with emotion to a room of only reporters. 
“Tonight we’ve come up short,” Cornyn said, adding that he’d support Paxton in the general election. 
“I’ve always supported the Republican ticket, and I intend to do so again.” 
Cornyn said in 2023 as Trump was running to return to the White House that his time “has passed him by,” a statement that came back to bite him. 
He also was an early critic of Trump’s plan for a border wall between the U.S. and Mexico  a project he now supports. 
Cornyn had the backing of Senate GOP leaders who said he would be the stronger general election candidate against Talarico, which was also the senator’s argument to voters before Tuesday. 
That’s not lost on Paxton, who said in his speech that “without a shadow of a doubt, I will be the Democrats’ No. 1 target in November.” 
Talarico’s campaign hit back Tuesday night on the social platform X, highlighting what they  and some Republicans  see as Paxton’s weakness, including an FBI investigation and impeachment for corruption in which he was later acquitted. 
Cornyn led Paxton in the March 3 primary but failed to win a majority. 
That was after Cornyn and his supporters waged a monthslong advertising campaign, mostly attacking Paxton over ethical and personal questions. 
The two-term attorney general was acquitted on corruption charges in a 2023 impeachment trial, where allegations of extramarital affairs surfaced. 
Paxton’s wife filed for divorce last year, citing “biblical grounds.” 
It gave Cornyn fodder for an ad campaign that, along with allied groups, spent roughly $109 million between the primary and runoff elections. 
Immediately after the primary, Trump promised to endorse but didn’t act until after early voting began last week. 
“Ken Paxton has gone through a lot, in many cases, very unfairly, but he is a fighter, and knows how to win,” Trump wrote in a social media post endorsing him. 
Retired Dallas-area resident David Jacobson, 70, said Trump’s endorsement was a factor in his decision to back Paxton on Tuesday. 
While Cornyn has for the most part been a strong Trump supporter, Jacobson generally thinks most politicians have remained in office too long. 
“Maybe it’s time for a change,” he said after voting. 
Linda Williams said she voted for Cornyn, calling him “the lesser of two evils.” 
She thought Cornyn had a better chance to beat Talarico this fall. 
“Because Paxton is a crook,” Williams said after voting in Plano, outside Dallas. 
Trump, in his endorsement, poked at Cornyn, saying he “was not supportive of me when times were tough” and that “John was very late in backing me.” 
Cornyn said Tuesday on Fox News Radio’s “The Brian Kilmeade Show” that the president’s ire was misplaced. 
He said, “grifters” are “claiming that I am opposed to the president’s agenda, and I think that’s caused some confusion with the president himself. 
But I’ve been supportive.” 
Some GOP strategists have argued that a Paxton nomination would cost millions of dollars more to promote in the fall, when money could be spent defending Republican seats in more competitive states. 
Democrats need to gain a net of four seats to take the majority. 
Cornyn had the support of Senate GOP leaders. 
Newly elected Rep. 
Christian Menefee defeated veteran Rep. 
Al Green in Texas’ 18th District, dispatching a longtime House incumbent who was one of Trump’s most outspoken critics. 
The Republican-led Texas Legislature redrew the district when it approved a new House map last year. 
The new map led to a runoff between incumbents and marks the end of a dizzying series of elections in the Houston area. 
Former Rep. 
Colin Allred beat U.S. 
Rep. 
Julie Johnson in the Dallas-area 33rd District’s Democratic primary runoff. 
Johnson was elected to the seat in 2024, the year Allred lost his U.S. 
Senate challenge to Republican Sen. 
Ted Cruz. 
Allred was running for Senate again this cycle but dropped his bid and instead sought a return to the House. 
Near San Antonio, Johnny Garcia won the Democratic primary for Texas’ 35th District against against Maureen Galindo, a candidate who has expressed antisemitic views. 
While Texas lawmakers redrew the district to help Republicans, Democrats view it as within reach and didn’t want Galindo’s past comments to impede them. 
Garcia will face Republican Carlos De La Cruz, who defeated John Lujan in the GOP primary. 
This story has been corrected to show that voter David Jacobson is 70, not 71. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 2.3%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.9%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 2.1%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic8.9%This article: 4.2%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 1.3%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 4.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 1.0%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias4.0%This article: 1.5%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 1.3%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias1.5%This article: 1.5%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 8.6%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect1.5%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.9%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.7%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.9%This article: 2.2%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.4%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect2.2%This article: 3.8%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 1.1%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias3.8%This article: 3.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 1.6%AP News: 2.0%Pessimism Bias3.0%This article: 18.5%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 10.7%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias18.5%This article: 11.4%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 2.4%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias11.4%This article: 1.9%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 2.9%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error1.9%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 3.1%AP News: 1.2%In-Group Bias2.3%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.1%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 2.1%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.7%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 1.6%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.8%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 6.2%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem7.9%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.7%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.3%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 4.7%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority8.3%This article: 1.3%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 2.8%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma1.3%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.1%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.7%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 4.7%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization3.7%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.2%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.3%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.3%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 5.3%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion10.3%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 1.1%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 9.7%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 3.6%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.7%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.5%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 1.0%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 1.7%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal3.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.3%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 2.0%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.3%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.3%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.9%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 3.1%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote7.9%This article: 8.3%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 2.6%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection8.3%This article: 12.4%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 4.6%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice12.4%This article: 2.7%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.8%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination2.7%This article: 3.5%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.5%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.5%This article: 4.5%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 2.2%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%THOMAS BEAUMONT: 0.0%AP News: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1066 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers25%attributed speech804writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageKen Paxton • 20 words • 100.0% coverageKen Paxton • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 31 words • 100.0% coverageDavid Jacobson • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Jacobson • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDavid Jacobson • 10 words • 0.0% coverageLinda Williams • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLinda Williams • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLinda Williams • 13 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 27 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 17 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 24 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
58 attributed words22% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+96.1 ptsWriter: 3.9%Donald Trump: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-16.4 ptsWriter: 16.4%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -6.0 ptsWriter: 6.0%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.4 ptsWriter: 3.4%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.