Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Run Off Elections results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 294 hits. Analysis detected 3,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (10,643 of 15,765 topics). This Run Off Elections is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group.
Run Off Elections
Topic details
Total words: 4,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos