Keyword summary
45% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,092 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Senate results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 2,156 hits . Analysis detected 13,822 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,994 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (25,138 of 35,668 keywords). This Texas Senate is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group. Texas Senate
Keyword details
Total words: 13,994
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles14K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 2.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst