Topic summary
88% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,242 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Races results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.1% saturation with 4,744 hits . Analysis detected 23,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,757 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,199 of 16,562 topics). This Senate Races is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Senate Races
Topic details
Total words: 15,757
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 30.1% 30.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.2% 14.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 30.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst