Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These James Pindell results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 509 hits. Analysis detected 945 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,094 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,629 authors). This James Pindell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
James Pindell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%James Pindell (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,094
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.7%2.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.2%1.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 24.3%24.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 7.3%7.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 2.2%2.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 24.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos