Topic summary
85% 11 analyzed articles/videos 8,933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Productivity results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 3,742 hits . Analysis detected 42,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,879 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (13,170 of 16,504 topics). This Productivity is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Productivity
Topic details
Total words: 45,879
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score11 analyzed articles45.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst