Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chandraveer Mathur results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 764 hits . Analysis detected 4,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,360 authors). This Chandraveer Mathur is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Chandraveer Mathur
Author details
Total words: 4,568
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Author 16.7%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst